Overview of Our International Trademark Registration Services
International Trademark Registration System – Madrid Protocol
The Madrid Protocol, also known as the Protocol Relating to the Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks, is an international system for trademark registration that provides a streamlined process for trademark holders to gain protection in multiple jurisdictions around the world.
Here’s a breif overview:
This system offers considerable advantages for trademark owners who do business in multiple countries or plan to expand abroad. However, it also has some complexities and potential pitfalls, so it’s advisable to consult with our trademark attorneys to assist in navigating international trademark registration.
Madrid Protocol International Trademark Application Procedures
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) allows US trademark owners to file international applications under the Madrid Protocol. Here is a brief summary of the steps involved in the process:
The USPTO and the Madrid Protocol System
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) interacts with the Madrid Protocol system in three primary ways:
These roles illustrate how the USPTO plays a crucial part in both outbound (from the U.S. to other countries) and inbound (from other countries to the U.S.) trademark registrations under the Madrid Protocol, as well as the ongoing management of international registrations.
Foreign Based Applicants for US Trademark Registration
A trademark applicant residing outside of the United States has the ability to apply for a United States trademark registration in a manner similar to a U.S. citizen or business. This involves submitting an application through the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and following U.S. trademark laws and regulations.
One crucial element is that, as of August 3, 2019, all foreign-domiciled applicants are required to be represented by an attorney who is licensed to practice law in the United States. This is to facilitate effective communication and ensure compliance with US Trademark Laws.
Section 44 Trademark Applications
The United States has assumed certain obligations from agreements adopted at the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property of 1883 and subsequent revisions to these agreements. The United States is also a member of the Inter-American Convention for Trademarks and Commercial Protection (also known as the “Pan-American Convention”), the Buenos Aires Convention for the Protection of Trade Marks and Commercial Names, the World Trade Organization, and certain other treaties and agreements. Section 44 of the Trademark Act, implements these agreements.
Section 44 of the United States Trademark Act allows foreign applicants to register their trademarks in the U.S. based on either a foreign application or a foreign registration. This provides a couple of unique advantages to non-U.S. applicants.
First, under Section 44(d), an applicant can file a trademark application in the U.S. based on a foreign application filed in their country of origin within the past six months. This allows the applicant to claim a priority date based on the foreign filing. The U.S. application must involve the same trademark and the same goods and/or services as the foreign application.
Second, under Section 44(e), an applicant can file a U.S. application based on a trademark registration in their country of origin. The benefit here is that the applicant doesn’t need to prove use of the trademark in U.S. commerce at the time of registration, which is usually required for U.S. trademark applicants.
However, eventually, to maintain the U.S. registration obtained via Section 44(e), the owner will have to start using the mark in U.S. commerce and provide a specimen of such use to the USPTO.
In both cases, the applicant must be a national of, domiciled in, or have a real and effective industrial or commercial establishment in the country of the foreign application or registration. Also, the application must be filed by a U.S.-licensed attorney.
It’s also worth noting that Section 44 can be combined with the Madrid Protocol. An applicant can file an international application under the Madrid Protocol based on a Section 44 application or registration. This gives the applicant a way to register their trademark in multiple countries, including the U.S., using a single application.
Section 66 Trademark Application – Extension of Protection to the United States
Section 66(a) is a Madrid Protocol trademark application. If a person or business located in a Madrid Protocol member country has a trademark registration or has applied for registration in their home country, they can file for international registration with their home country’s trademark office. As part of this international application, they can request an extension of protection to other Madrid Protocol member countries, including the United States.
When the home country’s trademark office receives the international application, it checks the application for compliance with the Madrid Protocol and certifies it. The application is then forwarded to the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), which performs a formal examination of the application. If approved, WIPO will register the trademark and publish it in the WIPO Gazette of International Trademarks.
Following this, WIPO sends a request for extension of protection to the United States and any other countries designated in the application. In the US, this request is examined by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in much the same way as a national trademark application. If the USPTO does not find any grounds for refusal, the mark is granted protection as though it were registered directly in the US.
It’s important to note that while the Madrid Protocol simplifies the application process for international registration, the actual protection of the mark is still subject to the laws of each individual country. Therefore, a trademark may be granted protection in one country and refused in another.
Madrid Protocol Member Countries
Status on June 9, 2022 | ||
---|---|---|
Afghanistan | African IPO (OAPI) | Albania |
Algeria | Antigua and Barbuda | Armenia |
Australia | Austria | Azerbaijan |
Bahrain | Belarus | Belgium |
Bhutan | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Botswana |
Brazil | Brunei Darussalam | Bulgaria |
Cabo Verde | Cambodia | Canada |
Chile | China | Colombia |
Croatia | Cuba | Cyprus |
Czech Republic | Democratic People’s Republic of Korea | Denmark |
Egypt | Estonia | Eswatini |
European Union | Finland | France |
Gambia | Georgia | Germany |
Ghana | Greece | Hungary |
Iceland | India | Indonesia |
Iran | Ireland | Israel |
Italy | Jamaica | Japan |
Kazakhstan | Kenya | Kyrgyzstan |
Lao People’s Democratic Republic | Latvia | Lesotho |
Liberia | Liechtenstein | Lithuania |
Luxembourg | Madagascar | Malawi |
Malaysia | Mexico | Monaco |
Mongolia | Montenegro | Morocco |
Mozambique | Namibia | Netherlands |
New Zealand | North Macedonia | Norway |
Oman | Pakistan | Philippines |
Poland | Portugal | Republic of Korea |
Republic of Moldova | Romania | Russian Federation |
Rwanda | Samoa | San Marino |
Sao Tome and Principe | Serbia | Sierra Leone |
Singapore | Slovakia | Slovenia |
Spain | Sudan | Sweden |
Switzerland | Syrian Arab Republic | Tajikistan |
Thailand | Trinidad and Tobago | Tunisia |
Turkey |